Nib #25: Robot Talk

The most common (and glaring) problem I see in young writers’ work is “Robot Talk” — the stringing of words together in an order no human being would ever speak.


Here is an example, a sentence taken from a mock constituent letter from a congressman, about biological males playing girls’ and women’s sports:


“I have witnessed first-hand the declarations of young females on the fear and injustice they have experienced across several aspects which come with people competing in the category of their chosen gender when it is not their biological sex.”


If you read the sentence carefully, you can discern a vague sense of its author’s meaning. It’s something like, “Young women have told me they find playing sports against biological males unfair and unsafe.”

But how does that turn into “fear and injustice they have experienced across several aspects”


I think the reason is insecurity, which explains why Robot Talk-writing is most common among students and young professionals. The problem is not that they are bad writers, or bad thinkers. It’s that they are trying to impress their readers (teachers, supervisors, hiring officers) and fear their own voices won’t cut it.


Robot Talk is literary imposter syndrome. It stems from a desire to sound profound. That’s why it doesn’t work.


Authentically smart people don’t try to seem smart. They try to be clear. They use words and sentences their audiences can easily understand. Go read an essay by Yuval Levin or a dissent by Antonin Scalia. No matter how abstruse the topic, you’ll understand every word.


Only frauds and show-offs, like third-rate academics, deliberately traffic in inscrutable, rococo language. Good writing clarifies; bad writing confuses.


The good news for young writers is that Robot Talk is easy to fix. It’s a two step process. The first is — as always — to read your drafts out loud as you edit and revise them. Your ear will almost always notice Robot Talk when spoken — because it won’t sound like normal speech. 


The second, and even more important cure for Robot Talk is … just relax. Don’t try to write like you imagine people smarter than you sound. Trust your own voice. 


Good writing doesn’t sound “smart.” It sounds clear. It sounds human. It sounds a lot like you when you’re just being yourself.


Until next week… keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
More Posts