Nib #24: Roger Federer’s Writing Lesson

The best part of Roger Federer’s commencement address at Dartmouth College last week was the first of three “tennis lessons” he gave the new graduates:


 “‘Effortless’ is a myth.”


Generations of tennis fans have marveled at how Federer made his G.O.A.T run on the court without ever seeming to break a sweat. Federer’s answer? Years of unrelenting discipline and toil behind the scenes.


 “The truth us,” Federer said, “I had to work very hard to make it look easy.”


 Of course he did! Just like Mohammad Ali, Michael Jordon, or Cal Ripken did. Making anything look easy is one of the hardest things a human being, made of crooked timber, can do. 


Writing is no exception. 


 Reading good writing feels effortless, too. The right words, put in the right order, make a reader — as Stephen King put it — “forget, whenever possible, that he/she is reading … at all.” 


Achieving this frictionless, telepathic effect is extremely difficult. It requires fanatical discipline — like the story of Ernest Hemingway spending a whole morning removing a comma from a sentence and all afternoon putting it back in. And it requires emotional detachment — remember William Faulkner’s admonition to “kill your darlings.”


But, as Federer said, when pursuing effortlessness, there is no alternative to “training harder… a lot harder.” 


 For young writers, “training harder” means writing more, reading more (and better), and editing down your clunky, fatty, awkward drafts until all that’s left is so clear, readable, and true that it looks like it must have been easy to write.


Until next week… keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
More Posts