Nib #26: Nib 26: Joe Biden and the Risks of Repetition

One of the easiest mistakes writers can make is repeating ourselves. We all have certain verbal tics and habits of mind that lead us to say the same things, or the same kind of things, over and over.


In friendly conversation, these unconscious refrains are endearing — a source of inside jokes and the occasional drinking game. In persuasive communication, however, unintended repetition is a killer.


President Joe Biden turned last week’s presidential debate into a masterclass on this point with his relentless overuse of “the idea.”


He offered the phrase as a scoffing dismissal of Donald Trump’s record and credibility, as in “The very idea…”:


The idea that [Trump] did something” to improve the economy.


The idea that [Trump] did something” on clean water.


The idea” that the United States would leave NATO.


The idea that I did anything wrong” in the Hunter Biden case.


It’s not a bad little phrase. The problem is, Biden said it 31 times in just 35 minutes of speaking time during the debate, including using it twice in the same sentence multiple times. Remember: the debate moderators only asked the candidates about 15 questions! 


That means Biden dropped “the idea” twice per answer, almost once per minute for an hour and a half!


This just won’t do. 


Repeating a phrase on purpose, for effect, is a powerful persuasive technique. Think of Lincoln’s “of the people, by the people, for the people.” Or King’s “I have a dream…” Or Churchill’s “We shall fight… We shall fight…” 


Repeat a phrase accidentally, on the other hand, and you risk sounding like Joe Biden at the debate.


We all have unconscious habits of thought and speech that make their way into our written work — especially our early drafts. Writers must be aware of theirs — and edit out the unintentional repetitions that can sap the strength out of even strong, vibrant words and phrases.


Until next week… keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
More Posts