Nib #27: Write the Truth. Don’t “Be Honest”

With the Republican and Democratic National Conventions at our throats just around the corner, this week’s Nib is for all the speechwriters out there working on their bosses’ 150-word paeans to partisanship:


Don’t “be honest.”


By that, I don’t mean lie, of course. Writers — and everyone else — should always tell the truth.


Rather, what I mean is that politicians should never, ever preface sentences with casual, special assertions of honesty:


“Truthfully speaking…”


“In all honesty…”


“To tell you the truth…”

“To be honest with you…”


Why? Because audiences distrust politicians. And when skeptical audiences hear a politician baptize some of his factual assertions with “Honestly…” (or the like), they subconsciously note that he left all his other assertions dry and heathen.


This rule needn’t apply to jokes, stories, and the like, where conversational rhythm can trump verbal integrity. But in persuasive communication, when success depends on credibility, unbidden professions of truthfulness project a “doth protest too much” vibe.


Just think for a moment about the most honest, trustworthy people you know. How often do they talk about how honest they are?


The lesson for young writers — and political speechwriters especially? Write truthfully, all the time, and you’ll never have to waste words telling people when you’re doing it.


Until next week… keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
More Posts