Nib #10: Give Your Idea an Origin Story

The best part of any superhero’s mythology is the beginning. Superman vs. Lex Luthor? Meh. Baby Kal-El, the last son of doomed Krypton, rescued and exiled to a strange world far away, where he must be hidden and protected from his enemies until he grows into his destiny? Now that’s the stuff.


So it is with persuasive writing. The most compelling part of a persuasive argument is its origin story. 


You can’t just lunge right in with “Pass a flat tax!” or “Ban TikTok!” or “Get rid of the designated hitter!” First of all, people may not even know what you’re talking about. And second, your target audience of unpersuaded-but-persuadable readers is likely to bristle at such bluntness.


Roman rhetoricians called the “beginning of the story” phase of persuasive structure the “contextio,” the context. They understood that to sell someone on a solution, you first have to tell the story of the problem in such a way that your solution seems the best one.


The most obvious approach is to go back in time. Persuasive writing frames today’s problems in the past tense. 


In 1863, when Abraham Lincoln set out to justify his then-controversial twofold strategy in the Civil War — union-restoration and emancipation — he began his argument, “Four score and seven years ago…”


In 1963, when Martin Luther King tried to win white Americans over to the then-controversial cause of civil rights, he opened his case by reminding the country of the Emancipation Proclamation. “Five score years ago,” King began his "I Have a Dream" speech.

When Michael Corleone provokes Hyman Roth in The Godfather, Part II — “Who had Frank Pentangeli killed?” — do you remember how Roth responds? In the past tense, telling the story of his friendship with Moe Greene: “There was this kid I grew up with.”


For an idea of how old this trick is, consider that Pericles’ funeral oration in 431 B.C., after a few sentences of throat-clearing, begins, “I will speak first of our ancestors.”


Advocating a new idea without an origin story is like hanging a new window without a frame. Persuasion depends on empathy. Empathy is about shared stories. And good stories have good beginnings.


Give your idea a good origin story, and your readers will give them a more receptive hearing.


Until next week… Keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
More Posts