Nib #9: Nikki Haley's Clever Pivot

Speeches ending political campaigns are tough. Not only must they (unconvincingly) put a happy face on defeat. They also self-execute old news. As soon as the candidate says “I’m suspending my campaign,” nothing else he or she says really matters anymore.

Nikki Haley had been facing this speech long before she finally gave it after Donald Trump sewed up the 2024 Republican presidential nomination on Super Tuesday. She gave a creditable performance of Concession Speech Greatest Hits — gratitude to supporters, a little policy checklist, quotes from Margaret Thatcher and the Bible.

But one paragraph in Haley’s speech rose above. Where most drop-out speeches would have included an endorsement of the winner, Haley said this:

“It is now up to Donald Trump to earn the votes of those in our party and beyond it who did not support him. And I hope he does that. At its best, politics is about bringing people into your cause, not turning them away. And our conservative cause badly needs more people. This is now his time for choosing.”

This is a clever pivot. Rather than endorsing Trump (yet), she challenges him — encouraging Trump to win the election, yes, while also preemptively blaming him if he loses in November.

The “time for choosing” bit recalls Ronald Reagan’s famous speech of that name. But unlike Reagan, who framed the 1964 election as a time for the American people to choose, Haley is saying 2024 is Donald Trump’s time for choosing. She’s suggesting that the outcome of the November election will be on Trump, one way or the other.

Why is this clever? Because Haley is probably running for president again in 2028.

If Trump wins in November, he will be ineligible to run again, and Haley can begin her campaign by taking credit for Trump doing what she suggested he do. If he loses, Haley’s pitch will be that it was Trump’s own fault, thereby bolstering her case for the nomination even if Trump runs again.

The lesson for young writers here is that even in a composition that is supposed to be formulaic, even clichéd, there is always room for thoughtful, meaningful, strategic prose.

Until next week… keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
More Posts