Nib #54 Joe Biden's Un-Fond Farewell

There were a thousand things wrong with President Joe Biden's biting, pharisaic Farewell Address. And a thousand lessons speechwriters can take from it.


But the Nib will only take up the speech's biggest unforced error: how badly it missed the moment.


You wouldn't know it from listening to the president Wednesday night, but Joe Biden wasn't on the ballot in November. Officially, he left office on his own terms. By rights, this ought to have been the retirement speech of a well-liked (by modern standards) elder statesman.


It could have been warm and gracious, full of paeans to bipartisanship and the American Dream. That kind of speech would have fit with its Oval Office setting -- dignified and intimate.


There are traces of this kind of speech in the text: the extended metaphor about the Statue of Liberty, the poignant autobiographical details, and even the short litany of his administration's accomplishments.


The American people would have appreciated that speech, if it wasn't too long. But the speech the president delivered wasn't really for the American people. It was for Biden and his inner circle. To vindicate. To settle scores. The whole thing came across like a stump speech for an imaginary do-over re-election campaign Biden is apparently running in his head.


The caustic tone and content shrunk the president. It made his halting delivery seem shambling instead of grandfatherly. It also invited pointed rebuttal, a strange choice for a president leaving office with a 36% approval rating.


Sections of the speech were pure cringe. Blaming the Los Angeles fires on climate change? Decrying billionaires' political influence after giving George Soros a presidential medal? Warning about the dangers of free speech?


No doubt some partisans ate it up. But presidential farewells shouldn't be partisan. They are a conspicuously non-partisan civic ritual. They're about burying hatchets, turning pages, and coming together. They are supposed to rise above personal grievances and partisan politics, and by example encourage the country to do that same.


That's what the moment demanded. And Biden was perfectly capable of meeting it. Better speechwriters would have given him the chance.


The lesson for speechwriters: meet the moment, don't try to hijack it.


Until next week... keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
More Posts