Nib #42 — Write with Verbs and Nouns

Why do writing instructors — from Strunk & White on down — always urge students to prioritize verbs and nouns over the other parts of speech?


Because verbs and nouns are real in a way that the other parts of speech are not. They are specific and tangible, like bricks. The other parts of speech are like mortar — essential, but only for holding the bricks together.


If you looked at a brick wall that was 50 percent mortar — half gray and only half red — you would question its structural integrity. That’s usually how clunky writing is: too many adjectives, adverbs, and prepositions. And not because of some literary, artistic choice, but because the sentences are loose and indirect.


Two-word sentences are bracing in their clarity and force:


Enemies prowl. Jesus wept. I do.

It’s not a coincidence that you can only make such sentences out of nouns and verbs. (“The very” or “If purple” don’t make sense.) It’s also not a coincidence that those two-word sentences lose their power when cluttered up with unnecessary modifiers:


If “Jesus wept” were instead, “When the sad news finally reached the gentle and loving Jesus, he wept mournfully,” it would not be one of the Bible’s most famous verses.

Until next week… keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
More Posts