Nib #20: Jerry Seinfeld and the Power of Framing

 In a much ballyhooed Commencement Address at Duke University earlier this month, Jerry Seinfeld put on a master-class in framing — the art of organizing an argument to make its conclusions more lively and compelling.


 The speech is worth reading, worth watching, and most of all, worth emulating.


 To appreciate Seinfeld’s success here, you first have to see his advice to Duke’s graduates as the bag of clichés it is. Work hard? Pay attention? Fall in love? Seize opportunities? Keep a sense of humor?


 How did such mundane content trigger so much praise and criticism? Because of the deftly arresting way Seinfeld frames his points. Throughout the speech, Seinfeld never simply decrees his life lessons. Rather, he sets them up, kind of like — well, exactly like — a comedian’s punchlines.


For instance, Seinfeld’s endorsement of hard work — “pure, stupid, no-real-idea-what-I’m-doing-here effort” — comes only after a two-paragraph bit roasting the undeserved glamour of “finding your passion.” 


“The hell with passion,” he says. “It’s embarrassing. Just be willing to do your work as hard as you can with the ability you have.”


 When he encourages graduates to “fall in love,” he again crosses up audience expectations. “It’s easy to fall in love with people,” he says. “I suggest falling in love with anything and everything, every chance you get” — like Bic pens, sneakers, and perfect pizza crust. 


 He even defends — quelle horreur — privilege! “Use your privilege!” he exhorts, which — for all its Culture War-coded language, is just another way of saying “take advantage of life’s opportunities,” which everyone would advise.


During this riff, Seinfeld drops the best line of his speech: “My point is we’re embarrassed about things we should be proud of and proud of things we should be embarrassed about.” The stadium responded with prolonged applause.


 Finally, Seinfeld defends humor. Not only as humanity’s natural medicine against despair: “the most powerful, most survival-essential quality you will ever have or need to navigate through the human experience.” But also, explicitly, as more important than young people’s admirable desire to avoid “hurting other people’s feelings.” 


 “The slightly uncomfortable feeling of awkwardness,” he says, the “occasional discomfort,” the “occasional hard feelings,” are worth suffering in order “to have some laughs.”


Once again, Seinfeld’s audience — woke academics and campus snowflakes! — burst in to applaud his affable but defiantly bougie, anti-PC message.


Seinfeld’s lesson to young writers here — and to young conservatives in particular — is that thoughtful, counterintuitive framing can charge even the stodgiest ideas with new and electric appeal.


Until next week… keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
More Posts