Nib #60 Very Significantly Unnecessary Words

This is one of those tips that will improve any kind of writing you do, from legal briefs to love poems: reconsider your intensifiers.


Intensifiers are adjectives and adverbs whose meaning boils down to “really a lot.” Words like very, significantly, quite, extremely, highly, exceptionally, really, absolutely, and utterly.


There’s nothing wrong with these words, exactly. But when combined with the nouns or verbs they modify, intensifiers often prolong sentences and muddy rather than clarify their meaning.


Consider the phrase “very smart person” — where the adverb very modifies the adjective smart, which modifies the noun person.


First, there are individual adjectives that already mean “very smart” without the adverb. Wise. Brilliant. Deep. Quick


Second, note how different all those specific adjectives are from each other. Any one of them could more precisely render the writer’s meaning while also shortening the sentence by a word. (And all things being equal, remember, shorter is better.)


Third, there are nouns that communicate “smart person” without any adjective or adverb. Genius. Einstein. Sage. Prodigy. Guru. Polymath. Here again, each word is different, and would put a different spin on the idea and picture in the reader's head.


If in the editing process, you can turn a three-word phrase like “very smart person” into a single word like “prodigy,” chances are it’s worth considering. (Especially if the single word is a verb or a noun: see Nib #42.)


This is not to say that writers should never use intensifiers. (As writer whose name I have forgotten once put it, “Of course you need the word ‘very,’ it means very.”) Rather, it’s a reminder to writers to use intensifiers — like all other words — intentionally. When you come across intensifiers as you edit and revise your drafts (and you will!), just take a moment and see if there is a less-wordy, more concrete way to render the same thought.


Until next week… keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
February 14, 2025
Three reasons why Republican politicians should write short press releases.
More Posts