Nib #59 Précis Writing

Not too long ago, young writers honed their craft by writing précis (“pray-see”) — brief synopses (in their own words) of longer works. Turn a given story or speech or essay into a single paragraph. Turn a long paragraph into a couple sentences. That kind of thing.


Précis are out of fashion today, along with most other exercises that actually help people learn to write. But in our era of social media character counts and “smart brevity,” the discipline of précis-writing is probably more valuable than ever.


After all, reading, analyzing, strategically condensing, and re-presenting content is more or less what professionals do. It’s the defining skillset for lawyers, PR reps, advertisers, agents, journalists, teachers, salespeople, consultants, lobbyists, government aides, etc.


Précis-writing can help writers of every age, skill-level, or academic or professional field. Very young professionals especially could not but benefit from spending 30 minutes a few days a week summarizing an oped or cable news rant in 100 words. Précis teach writers how to prioritize and simplify, how to edit language down to its essence. They force us to take ownership of the ideas we read about, and to restate them with concision and clarity.


In other words,  précis will teach you — force you — to think and write like a writer. Give it a try! 


And until next week… keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 14, 2025
Three reasons why Republican politicians should write short press releases.
More Posts