Nib #58 Two-Cent Press Releases

In almost every form of writing, concision trumps verbosity. (Of course, concision also trumps mere brevity, as noted in Nib #48.)


Nowhere is concision’s value more evident than in press releases. Specifically, the quotes in press releases issued by Republican politicians.


Too many public figures and their press teams assume that the purpose of a press release is to ‘state their case’ on some issue. No. That’s what opeds and speeches and other, longer-form formats are for.


Press releases are only designed to add two cents into a public and media discussion. And two cents should usually mean two sentences.


There are three reasons why:


1. Reporters don’t really care what rando politicos say. Unless it’s the president, or a central figure in a breaking, headline-grabbing emergency (like a natural disaster or career-threatening scandal), you’re not getting more than one or two quotes into the media’s coverage of the story. So don’t waste your breath.


2. Message discipline. The more sentences you include in a press release quote, the more power journalists have over your boss’s message. For Republicans, surrendering this power to liberal-leaning reporters is malpractice. If a release quote is five sentences long, biased reporters can print the weakest of the five and make your boss look bad all while putatively practicing journalistic fairness. So don’t let reporters choose your message.


3. On social media, shorter is better anyway. Even if you ignore reporters altogether, pithier, punchier quotes make for better social media posts anyway. So don’t dilute your own message.


There is nothing wrong with including context and background information in a press release. Dates and places and bill numbers and cosponsors, and people the politician met with, etc. But that stuff can all come before the quote and after the quote. 


Like all writing formats, press release quotes should be written intentionally and strategically. Who is the message for? What is its purpose? How best can it be delivered to that audience and achieve that end?


If you need more space to make a longer, more complex argument, that’s what essays and think tank panels and even books are for.


Most Republican press releases, most of the time, do best when they express their two cents in one or two sentences.


Until next week… keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
More Posts