Nib #48 — Concision

One of the most important qualities of good writing — second, perhaps, only to clarity — is concision. Writers should strive to pack as much information as they can — to cover as much ground, as it were — per word.


Concision is distinct from brevity. Brevity means shortness as such — short sentences, short paragraphs, short compositions. Concision, on the other hand, refers to economy of language — speed and efficiency, conveying ideas in as few words as is necessary.


Think of it this way: a 300-word memo is not necessarily better than a 1,000-word memo. But if it clearly communicates everything the 1,000-word memo does, the 300-word memo is almost certainly better.


Concision saves time and reduces confusion. It also spurs writers toward eloquence.


Consider the little passages below. Try to ignore their familiarity and poetic beauty, and consider instead just how much information — identities, ideas, images, emotions — they communicate in a few words:


“Hope is the thing with feathers — That perches in the soul…”


“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal…”


“… government of the people, by the people, for the people…”


“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”


Think about how many sentences — paragraphs! — it would take you to convey the fullness of those thoughts in your own words.


That’s the power of concision. It charges writing the way reducing intensifies a sauce, or eliminating wasted motion gives an athlete more speed and power. The fewer words used expressing a thought, the more potent each word — and the overall composition — becomes.


Until next week… keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
More Posts