Nib #65 Be a One-Eyed Writing King

Unless you spend hours every week reading young Americans’ writing, it’s impossible to understand just how bad it has gotten. That’s the takeaway from two short, damning essays published earlier this week.


First, there is “We Need to Do Something About Student Writing,” by Liza Libes. Libes is an educational consultant who coaches high school seniors on their college applications and essays. She puts the point bluntly enough: 


“over the past several years, I have noticed an alarming trend amongst my seventeen-year-olds: no one knows how to write anymore.”


The second essay, by a college professor who writes under the pseudonym Hilarius Bookbinder, is even less delicate: “The Average College Student Is Illiterate.”


Bookbinder describes his students’ writing submissions as either awful — “Spelling is atrocious, grammar is random, and the correct use of apostrophes is cause for celebration.” — or otherwise obviously produced by AI.


For the purposes this Nib, what matters here is not who to blame for young Americans’ inability to write, or how to fix the problem. What matters is simply the opportunity it offers to any student or young professional who sincerely sets out to improve his or her writing.


Teens and 20-somethings today do not have to become great writers to stand out anymore. They don’t even have to be very good. Producing merely competent, coherent, consistent prose will make them comparative Shakespeares and Hemingways and Austens among their peers.


Let the old lament this state of affairs; the young should exploit it! Take the time, take the care. Read good writing, and hone your own. Anyone can do it, and the few who try will be rewarded for it. In a generation of blind “illiterates,” even one-eyed writers will be kings.


Until next week… keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
February 14, 2025
Three reasons why Republican politicians should write short press releases.
More Posts