Nib #15: Dress for the Occasion

Most speeches are — and should be — workaday things. People don’t come to PTA meetings or subcommittee hearings for spellbinding rhetoric. And most speech-givers can’t deliver it anyway. So part of a speechwriter’s job is dressing for the occasion.


The writers of President Biden’s State of the Union Address last month failed this test when they gassed up his peroration with this:


“I see a future where we defend democracy not diminish it. I see a future where we restore the right to choose and protect other freedoms not take them away. I see a future where the middle class finally has a fair shot and the wealthy finally have to pay their fair share in taxes. I see a future where we save the planet from the climate crisis and our country from gun violence. 


“Above all, I see a future for all Americans! I see a country for all Americans!”


 The writers here are employing anaphora — the rhetorical technique of beginning successive sentences with the same phrase to create poetic rhythm. The problem isn’t the writing, as such. The problem is… Joe Biden is not a prophet!


No one sees him as a visionary leader like an Abraham Lincoln, a Martin Luther King, or even a Barack Obama. And with good reason! Biden himself has curated a down-to-earth, back-slapping personal brand for more than 50 years. His entire 2020 presidential campaign was based on the man’s practiced familiarity and normalcy.


But rather than lean into that vibe — and play to their boss’s strengths — Biden’s staff instead committed the cardinal sin of speechwriting: they wrote for themselves instead of the strategy. Joe Biden’s big-speech perorations should be folksy and self-effacing. His rhetorical model should be Bob Cratchit, not Henry V. By ignoring this, Biden’s speechwriters actually undermined their own speech, their boss, and his broader political strategy.


The lesson for speechwriters here: don't bring kale-foam to a cookout or wear a ballgown to a ballgame. Tailor your text to the speaker, the moment, and the strategy -- never your ego.


Until next week… keep writing!

April 25, 2025
Five quick tips for polishing your prose.
April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
More Posts